joe5 wrote:Please compare evalid with LiquidTest?
In any product comparison question, we will answer as fairly as we can but please do remember that we represent the eValid solution.
LiquidTest is a JavaScript "framework" that permits a user to do browser driver type actions via writing a program that, when it runs, does the test playback by driving the browser.
On the other hand, eValid is a complete record/play product (not just a framework) that uses browser-internal signals. eValid playbacks don't interfere at all with the operation of any JavaScript programs...while any JavaScript program that you run for test purposes, as is the case in LiquitJade and a range of other, similar eValid workalikes, inevitably interfers with the timing and performance data.
(That is why eValid chose long ago to NOT use the JavaScript route. In addition to causing interference with JavaScript during AJAX application operations it also kills the scalability...the JavaScript programs that accomplish the playback are very large, so you can only run a very small number of playbacks in parallel. In other words, eValid is a better approach.)
The eValid Team
by joe5 » Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:11 pm